Legalizing marijuana for healthcare or recreational purposes is not related with an uptick in targeted traffic fatalities, according to a new study released this month.
Kansas State University graduate student Andrew Young looked at information on typical targeted traffic fatalities more than 23 years and utilized two models to assess the effect of cannabis reform on road security.
“[L]egalizing marijuana is not discovered to be a statistically substantial predictor of fatality prices,” he concluded. “This acquiring signifies that the legalization of marijuana for each healthcare and recreational purposes is not related with either a reduction or boost in fatalities per 100,000 car miles traveled.”
Soon after conducting a regression evaluation that turned up no proof that state legalization efforts outcome in an boost or reduce in targeted traffic fatalities, Young utilized a distinction-in-distinction model to evaluate the targeted traffic fatality prices in legal cannabis states and manage states. The additional tailored evaluation covered an eight-year timeline, beginning 5 years ahead of the state in query legalized marijuana.
No concrete trends emerged from that evaluation.
The fatal auto accident price was significantly larger in Colorado compared to Georgia and Iowa in 2001, but that trend began taking place prior to healthcare cannabis legalization and also leveled out by 2003.
“The final results of the evaluation recommend that there is no statistically partnership in between marijuana legalization and fatal crashes,” Young wrote. “These findings recommend that issues of policy makers and the public that legalizing marijuana will worsen road security are not totally founded.”
“According to the distinction-in-variations model, the current upward trend of targeted traffic fatality prices nationwide is not a outcome of healthcare marijuana legalization. In reality, the legalization of marijuana is not discovered to be a predictor of targeted traffic fatalities,” he wrote.
The most important limitation of the study, which has not been published in a peer-reviewed journal, issues states exactly where cannabis has been legalized for adult use. The little sample size, at least compared to healthcare marijuana states, signifies the evaluation may not have been in a position to “fully estimate the effect of recreational cannabis on targeted traffic security.”
That stated, the findings reflect these of various previous research that have also failed to determine a statistically substantial partnership in between legalization and road security.
A further current study also debunked the myth that targeted traffic accidents spike on the cannabis vacation four/20.
Study Debunks Claim That Targeted traffic Deaths Boost On The four/20 Marijuana Vacation